Stage Fright (1950): Hitchcock’s Cinematic “Trick” or Treat?

Once upon a time there was an Alfred Hitchcock film. But not just any Alfred Hitchcock film.

This film had the distinction of dividing fans of The Master of Suspense, for The Master himself claimed he made a mistake in his choices on the production. By the time he realized it, time was no more.

The very premise of Stage Fright is based on the theater, the birthplace of artifice and illusion. And as the credits roll, the safety curtain rises on our story.

With this in mind, did Hitchcock really make a mistake or does his cinematic “trick” fit like hand in glove?

The Plot

Eve Gill (Jane Wyman), an aspiring actress, seeks to clear the name of her friend and crush Jonathan Cooper (Richard Todd) while posing as a lady’s maid to the woman (Marlene Dietrich) whose husband Jonathan is accused of murdering.

The Production

Stage Fright takes its source material from the 1947 novel Man Running by Selwyn Jepson and was adapted for the screen by Whitfield Cook, Ranald MacDougall, and Alma Reville (Hitchcock), with additional dialogue by James Bridie.

Stage Fright began production under Hitchcock and Sidney Bernstein’s Transatlantic Pictures, founded in 1946. Their first two films, Rope (1948) and Under Capricorn (1949), released through Warner Brothers were box-office failures.

Stage Fright was shot at Elstree Studios in London, with location shooting at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art and the Scala Theatre. Production was completed at Warner Brothers.

The Cast

Decked out in glistening diamonds and creations by Christian Dior, Marlene Dietrich steals the show as Charlotte Inwood, the glamorous stage actress and singer who entangles Jonathan Cooper in her seductive web.

Charlotte Inwood could have been stereotypical and dull but in Dietrich’s hands is fascinating and electric. Just when we think we’ve got her number, she unveils another layer of her personality.

The cinematography adds to this effect as the lens ambiguously caress her.

According to Hitchcock’s Heroines by Caroline Young, Hitchcock knew of Dietrich’s technical prowess and let her have free reign of her camera angles and lighting.

Because of this it almost appears as if Dietrich is in an entirely different movie than her co-stars, as her shots are in soft focus and every inch the star treatment – think von Sternberg.

Surprisingly, the effect is not jarring. It aids in our perception of her character.

Charlotte Inwood might just top Endora from Bewitched with the many names she calls Doris Tinsdale, Eve’s alias, with everything from Phyllis to Nancy.

Her disconscern with something as “trivial” as her maid’s name is both amusing and telling.

Because Charlotte Inwood is a singer and actress it gave Marlene Dietrich the opportunity to wear amazing gowns add some tunes to her repertoire.

In the film, Dietrich sings “The Laziest Gal in Town,” written by Cole Porter for Stage Fright, and friend Edith Piaf’s “La Vie En Rose.” These songs would become part of Dietrich’s famous one-woman stage shows which blossomed in the mid-1950’s.

We experience most of Stage Fright through the eyes of Eve Gill.

Fresh off her Oscar win for Johnny Belinda, Jane Wyman has a likable quality that corresponds well with Eve’s character, bringing this curious, daring girl to the screen through her spirited performance.

Eve takes us along with her as she adopts a guise and Cockney accent while gathering evidence to indict Charlotte Inwood with the murder.

Although Wyman felt overshadowed by Dietrich (sources say she would break down in tears after seeing the rushes) we have to root for her in order for the story to work – and we do.

We feel the fear of her ruse being discovered by Detective Smith (Michael Wilding) whom she befriends and her confusion as she begins to fall for him.

Richard Todd convincingly portrays the confusion and mad desperation of Jonathan Cooper – a man on the run with no where to turn except to Eve and her family.

Beneath his stalwart quality, Todd gives off an unsettling edge, where one can imagine something darker.

Todd was hot stuff at this point in his career, having won a Golden Globe Award for Most Promising Male Newcomer of 1949, an Academy Award nomination for Best Actor and a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor for his performance in the The Hasty Heart (1949).

With his talent and fame, it is clear why Hitchcock would be eager to snatch him up for Stage Fright.

See all three leads in action here – if cou can find them beneath all the feathers 🙂

The Supporting Players

Stage Fright has been described by some as Hitchcock’s family oriented picture. Eve has a loving, supportive father (Alastair Sim) who tries to help her out of the many jams she gets herself into.

Although Eve’s father and mother (Sybil Thorndike) don’t always get along, you can sense their love for Eve.

These two bring an undeniable magic to the screen in their scenes together as they address each other indirectly and show their affectionate disdain for one another.

Hitchcock was intrigued by this project since it afforded him the opportunity to return to London, his first time since leaving for Hollywood in 1939, to be near his daughter Patricia – a student at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art.

Patricia did some stunt driving for Jane Wyman and also has a small part in the film as Eve’s friend, Chubby Bannister. How’s that for a name?

Conclusion

I greatly enjoy this film. It emanates warmth, charm, and wit while delivering the director’s signature mystery and suspense.

Stage Fright won’t make you hold onto your seat, but it just might surprise you as familiar Hitchcockian themes present themselves in a cleverly told manner that was very much ahead of its time.

What do you think about Stage Fright? No spoilers, please!

This post is my contribution to The Distraction Blogathon hosted by Rebecca at Taking Up Room. Thanks for letting me participate, Rebecca!

Head on over HERE for more distractions from the silver screen!

19 thoughts on “Stage Fright (1950): Hitchcock’s Cinematic “Trick” or Treat?

  1. I laughed when you said Marlene Dietrich seems to be in a different movie that everyone else. But, like you mentioned, it sets her character apart (and above?) the others.

    This is a terrific film, and I love the ending that shall not be mentioned. I was truly surprised the first time I saw it.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I’m in the “annoyed” camp for this one. To me, this movie is like when you want a cold soda on a hot day, and once you get one, you get distracted from it and when you return, it’s gone warm and flat. The problem is you’re still thirsty…

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Brian Schuck

    I haven’t seen this one in years, but with your wonderful screen captures and synopsis, I feel like I just watched it. 🙂 It’s interesting that Hitchcock gave Dietrich such wide latitude given his reputation for being less than solicitous of his actors, but then, it’s Marlene Dietrich.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! I found the Dietrich/Hitchcock working relationship quite interesting as well. It’s refreshing to see Hitch relent some control, as we know he didn’t do so very often. From my research, the two were thick as thieves and got along swimmingly. Also, an unexpected surprise.

      Thanks for stopping by, Brian! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Wow, I didn’t know HItchcock made anything low-key–this looks really good. And I haven’t seen Richard Todd in anything but “A Man Called Peter,” so him being in the cast piques my interest. Thanks again for joining the blogathon with this great review! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I hope you get a chance to see Stage Fright, Rebecca. It is so enjoyable and sometimes a lighter Hitchcock is just the ticket.

      I have heard A Man Called Peter is a good movie from Eric Binford’s review. Looking forward to seeing that one.

      Thank you for hosting! 🙂 I had a great time!

      Like

  4. It amazes me how you continue to highlight films I’ve never even heard of. 😀

    It’s so interesting that Hitchcock regretted some of his choices in this one. I’m sure it’s difficult, in a way, to put a creative work out into the world – only to realize some aspect isn’t really the way you want it and it can’t be changed. That finality would bug me. I’m curious – what was the mistake Hitchcock felt he made?

    Also, this truly was a family affair – with Hitchcock’s wife involved in the writing and his daughter appearing in the film. 😀 (She’s adorable, by the way – and she bore a remarkable resemblance to Jane Wyman!) I just looked her up quickly on Wikipedia. She passed away just a few months ago (in August) 😦 – at the age of 93.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m happy to introduce you to them! 🙂 The production story on Stage Fright is pretty neat between Marlene Dietrich, the cinematic “trick,” and the family angle. Ooh I will never tell, haha! 😉

      The resemblance is uncanny between Wyman and Pat Hitchcock. And isn’t she sweet? Yes, sadly, we lost her recently 😦 she appears on many of the documentaries about her father’s movies. Always a treat to hear her stories!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s